Value added tax (VAT): administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud
This dossier concerns value added tax administrative cooperation to combat VAT fraud. Amendments cite the VAT gap and the link between VAT fraud and organised crime, establish the central electronic information system CESOP for payment data with retention periods, restrict access to Eurofisc liaison officials, invoke the European Public Prosecutor's Office, and call for common statistics on intra-Community VAT fraud.
Plenary votes
1 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 17 Dec 2019Passedoutcome from totalsOn a single vote on the whole textOfficial label: Vote unique · what was voted ↗591 for18 against86 abstentions55 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
4 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
17 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.