The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins
This own-initiative report examines the impact of implementing the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins. The amendments stress that fisheries and aquaculture, especially small-scale fishers and shellfish farmers, are under pressure from offshore renewable energy, marine protected areas and other blue-economy sectors, and call for better coordination between Member States, sea-basin and cross-border approaches, robust scientific and socio-economic assessments, and transparent stakeholder participation. Several address Brexit effects, coastal erosion, generational renewal, and the revision of the Directive under the expected EU Oceans Act.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled10 Feb 2026 · including EP official documents, Feb–Jul 2026
- Plenary vote — Adopted20 May 2026 · On the motion for a resolution — the text as a whole
Plenary votes
8 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 5 earlier votes
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 4 — paragraph 16Official label: § 16 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗197 for444 against5 abstentions71 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 2 — paragraph 31Official label: § 31 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗185 for434 against11 abstentions87 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 5 — paragraph 41Official label: § 41 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗186 for441 against10 abstentions80 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 7 — text to be inserted after paragraph 42Official label: Après le § 42 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗114 for447 against81 abstentions75 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 6 — paragraph 69Official label: § 69 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗188 for449 against11 abstentions69 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 1 — text to be inserted after recital COfficial label: Après le considérant C - Am 1 · what was voted ↗198 for445 against8 abstentions66 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026RejectedOn amendment 3 — recital FOfficial label: Considérant F - Am 3 · what was voted ↗198 for440 against7 abstentions72 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 20 May 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution — the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗518 for31 against102 abstentions66 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
27 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
274 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.