EU/Greenland/Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement. Implementing Protocol (2025-2030)
The dossier concerns the EU/Greenland/Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement implementing protocol for 2025-2030. The amendments call for an impact assessment of the added value and socio-economic benefits of the previous agreement, address a transfer of commitment appropriations approved by the budgetary authority, question the need for provisional application of the protocol given the existing protocol's validity, and note appropriations in the 2025 budget.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled23 Jan 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted8 Jul 2025 · On the draft Council decision
- Plenary vote — Adopted8 Jul 2025 · On the motion for a resolution — the text as a whole
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
10 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Where each group stood at the decisive votes
Milestones are the votes that adopt or reject text (not every amendment vote) — the percentage is the share of the group’s Members behind that position. Click a column heading to open the vote below.
Show the 7 earlier votes
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 2 — text to be inserted after paragraph 2Official label: Après le § 2 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗214 for438 against25 abstentions42 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 3 — paragraph 11Official label: § 11 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗146 for525 against7 abstentions41 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 17Official label: § 17 · what was voted ↗554 for85 against41 abstentions39 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 4 — paragraph 32Official label: § 32 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗304 for334 against38 abstentions43 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 5 — paragraph 34Official label: § 34 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗237 for436 against6 abstentions40 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 6 — text to be inserted after paragraph 34Official label: Après le § 34 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗294 for334 against47 abstentions44 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025RejectedOn amendment 8 — recital OOfficial label: Considérant O - Am 8 · what was voted ↗179 for488 against7 abstentions45 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025AdoptedOn amendment 7 — recital OOfficial label: Considérant O - Am 7 · what was voted ↗422 for201 against56 abstentions40 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution — the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗561 for109 against11 abstentions38 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jul 2025Main voteAdoptedOn the draft Council decisionOfficial label: Projet de décision du Conseil · what was voted ↗616 for29 against36 abstentions38 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
2 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
4 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.