Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning question time, the central rostrum, the blue-card procedure, the explanations of votes, the transparency register and the Ombudsman
The dossier concerns amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure on question time, the central rostrum, the blue-card procedure, explanations of votes, the transparency register and the Ombudsman. The amendments set arrangements for question time, ensuring Members of different political views and Member States put questions in turn, and provide for written statements and explanations of vote of no more than 400 words appended to the report or the Member's page.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled6 Mar 2023
- Plenary vote — Passed19 Apr 2023 · On the proposed decision
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
1 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 19 Apr 2023Main votePassedoutcome from totalsOn the proposed decisionOfficial label: Proposition de décision · what was voted ↗610 for6 against2 abstentions87 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
1 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
6 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.