The effectiveness of Member States' use of EU Solidarity Fund money in cases of natural disasters
The dossier concerns the effectiveness of Member States' use of EU Solidarity Fund money in cases of natural disasters. Amendments revise citations, recitals and paragraphs on the European Union Solidarity Fund, the extension of its scope to major public health emergencies, increased advance payments, its merger into the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve, the time taken to deploy grants, reporting obligations, and synergies with the European Green Deal.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled7 Jun 2021 – 16 Jul 2021
- Plenary vote — Passed19 Oct 2021 · On the motion for a resolution — the text as a whole
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
1 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 19 Oct 2021Main votePassedoutcome from totalsOn the motion for a resolution — the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗675 for14 against11 abstentions5 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
22 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
65 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.